We use cookies to provide you a better service and analyze traffic. To find out more about cookies, please see our Privacy Policy. By continuing to browse our website, you agree to our use of cookies.
We use cookies to provide you a better service and analyze traffic. To find out more on Privacy Policy.
We have no control over third-party cookies - you can turn them off through Google on https://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout.However, if your browser is blocking third-party cookies, some of these features can't work properly and you may experience problems with the Website.
  • Blog
  • A global report on social media censorship

A global report on social media censorship

Jul 13, 2023   |   4 mins to read
Explore a groundbreaking report on global social media censorship, shedding light on the extent and implications of content restrictions.

Table of contents

A global report on social media censorship

In recent years, the explosive growth of social media platforms has revolutionized how people communicate, share information, and express their opinions. However, concerns about social media censorship have arisen alongside the tremendous benefits of this digital revolution.

We delve into comprehensive information that sheds light on the state of global social media censorship, exploring its implications for freedom of expression in the digital age.

The rise of social media and its impact on free speech

Social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Whatsapp, and YouTube have become powerful tools for individuals to voice their opinions, mobilize movements, and hold governments and corporations accountable. With billions of users worldwide, social media has reshaped the landscape of public discourse, offering unprecedented connectivity and information exchange.

The landscape of online censorship across countries

Online censorship takes various forms, including content blocking, filtering, website takedowns, surveillance, and legal measures. While some countries employ censorship primarily for national security reasons, others use it to control dissent, suppress political opposition, or limit access to information that challenges the ruling regime.

Belize

The Internet in Belize is generally free, but there are reports of the Government monitoring online activities, which can lead to subtle forms of Internet censorship.

Cuba

Cuba is widely prevalent, and political dissent is typically silenced. The Cuban Government heavily controls all news, information, and entertainment aspects. The Government also controls the country's internet infrastructure and limits citizens' access. It deems counter-revolutionary, filters emails, and tracks online activity regularly.

European Union (EU)

The EU has been actively exploring ways to address online censorship and promote user safety. The Digital Services Act (DSA) and Digital Markets Act (DMA), proposed by the European Commission, seek to establish more precise rules and responsibilities for online platforms. The acts aim to strike a balance between addressing illegal content, protecting fundamental rights, and fostering a digital market.

France

France has taken steps to combat hate speech, disinformation, and terrorist content. The Avia Law, adopted in 2020, requires online platforms to remove specified illegal content quickly.

Germany

Germany is at the forefront of combating hate speech and disinformation online. In 2017, the country enacted the Network Enforcement Act (NetzDG), compelling social media platforms to remove illegal content within specified timeframes.

Iran

Iran employs a combination of technical and legal measures to regulate online content. The Government filters websites deemed "immoral" or "threatening," blocks social media platforms, and monitors online activities. Citizens are often subjected to surveillance and face repercussions for expressing dissenting views. This is one of the countries that are subject to strict controls on pornography.

Mexico

The Mexican media landscape is diversified but is often influenced by political and economic interests. Mexico does not significantly filter or control online content. Internet penetration in Mexico is relatively high, and social media platforms are an essential news source.

Myanmar

During the tumultuous period of military rule, Myanmar was isolated, and access to the Internet, Twitter, Facebook, etc., was restricted, but Myanmar is not currently blocking the Internet.

North Korea

North Korea's Internet is highly restricted and tightly controlled by the Government. Most citizens have no access to the global Internet, and only a select few have limited access to a state-controlled intranet. The Government tightly monitors online activities and restricts content that challenges its authority.

Saudi Arabia

The Saudi Arabian Government actively censors social media platforms to control dissent and restrict access to sensitive information. Authorities have previously blocked platforms like Twitter, WhatsApp, and Telegram and engaged in content filtering and surveillance to monitor and control online discussions.

Syria

Media in Syria is primarily state-controlled, and censorship is highly prevalent. Journalists in Syria face significant risks, including detention, disappearance, torture, and even death.

On the digital front, the Government also practices widespread internet censorship. The Syrian Government reportedly practices surveillance of internet activity, email interception, and site blocking and has sometimes shut down the country's entire Internet.

Turkey

Turkey has increasingly tightened its grip on online freedom of expression, employing legal and technical measures. The Government has blocked access to social media platforms and news outlets critical of the regime and imprisoned individuals for their online activities. Turkey restricts VPN use, so does Belarus.

United Arab Emirates

UAE telecom operators have vigorously blocked Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services such as Skype or WhatsApp, forcing many migrant workers to pay high communication fees.

United Kingdom

The UK has proposed legislation to regulate online content through the Online Safety Bill. The bill aims to hold social media companies accountable for user-generated content,

focusing on preventing harm and ensuring user safety.

Venezuela

Social media restrictions still exist in Venezuela, with increased restrictions on VPNs, some of which are blocked.

(Image created by datawrapper, source: Comparitech)

Censorship has far-reaching implications for individuals and societies. It can limit freedom of speech, hinder the free exchange of ideas, stifle creativity, and hinder societal progress.

Why you need a VPN to defeat the common online censorship?

VPNs can combat online censorship by rerouting internet traffic through servers in various countries to conceal a user's location.

In addition, VPNs secure user data by creating an encrypted tunnel, ensuring the privacy of users' online activities from potential snoops. They also mask your original IP address and assign a new one from a country where the VPN service operates, tricking the internet into believing you're in a different location and circumventing location-based censorship.

Furthermore, VPNs can evade firewalls often employed for online censorship and offer unrestricted internet access by bypassing blockades on specific sites or applications. Also, VPNs can circumvent throttling by ISPs that typically slow down specific data types, like when streaming online videos, a common form of internet censorship.

Online censorship poses significant challenges to freedom of expression, access to information, and fundamental rights in various countries. As we move forward in the digital age, engaging in open dialogues, supporting initiatives that protect digital rights, and striving for a more inclusive and accessible online environment that respects the diverse voices and perspectives of individuals worldwide is crucial.